25159

Theodore Roosevelt Typed Letter Signed on Writing

Currency:USD Category:Collectibles / Autographs Start Price:1.00 USD Estimated At:800.00 - 1,200.00 USD
Theodore Roosevelt Typed Letter Signed on Writing
<B>Theodore Roosevelt Typed Letter Signed on Writing and Being Edited</B></I> Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919) twenty-sixth President (1901-1909). A dynamic man, Roosevelt was Assistant Secretary of the Navy, but resigned to volunteer for the Spanish-American War, where he led his "Rough Riders" up San Juan Hill. He was governor of New York and later President William McKinley's Vice President, becoming President when McKinley was assassinated. As President, he initiated the Panama Canal, negotiated the end of the Russo-Japanese War, for which he was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize, passed conservation legislation, and attacked business monopolies. He ran again unsuccessfully for the Presidency in 1912, where he survived an assassination attempt. Typed letter signed, three pages, December 20, 1911, New York. The letter is written on <I>The Outlook</B></I> letterhead, and reads: "I thank you for your letter and appreciate it, as I do all your courtesies. I hardly know whether to write to those good people or not. I suppose we are all apt to take too much for granted of the other fellow's knowledge of our own working conditions. You, an editor, especially with your experience in such a matter as reciprocity with, for instance, the <I>Saturday Evening Post,</B></I> would understand quite as clearly as I do the utter impossibility of expecting any publication to take a very long article which they did not think would interest their readers. Of course I assumed when we were having our conversation with those gentlemen that they could not possibly fail to understand that <I>The Outlook</B></I> editors would not put in their article if it was not so written that they thought their readers would read it -- it would not be of any advantage to have it put in if it was not read. I cannot get anything put into <I>The Outlook</B></I> by anyone on any subject unless the editors think that it is so written and of such a nature that their readers will be interested in it. A moment's reflection will show that this is the only possible standpoint the editors can take unless they expect to wind up <I>The Outlook</B></I> as a going concern. If they put in articles which people will not read, it means that they would have to shut up shop, and they themselves must be the judges on this matter. I present them at times articles and urge the importance of the articles, but they are the final judges, just as you are the final judge in your own magazine. The article submitted to us was one much longer than any personally have ever ventured to request the editors to accept from my pen, a much longer article than I have ever written even on such a subject as the trusts, or the judiciary, or the McNamara murders. After reading it carefully, the editors unanimously came to the conclusion, and so informed me, that not only could they not publish such a long article, but that they did not believe it brought out the points in a way to which their readers would pay heed. They wished to be as nice as possible with me, and after a good deal of discussion they finally said they would endeavor themselves to put out an abstract in which they would as forcefully as possible present every point made, but that as they themselves were entirely opposed to the article they felt that they would have to answer the points. This was all I could get, and this was all I had a right to ask, and it was considerably more than anyone else would have gotten from <I>The Outlook.</B></I> It seems to me that Mr. Bacon, as editor of the <I>Grand Forks Times,</B></I> would understand this. I am certain Judge Amidon entirely understands it. If you see Mr. Kingman and Mr. Twichell, I wonder if you could read them what I have written. I do not feel like volunteering to write them myself, simply because it seems to me a little absurd for me to be in the attitude of defending myself because the editors of <I>The Outlook</B></I> thought that a certain article was so long that they did not feel at liberty to put it into their pages, but as a favor to me did put it in an abstract bringing out all the essential points in the article. As I am simply a Contributing Editor, with no say-so as to what goes into <I>The Outlook,</B></I> my trying to get the article in at all was merely an act of special friendship for the gentlemen who wanted it put in. It is the kind of thing I have resolutely to refuse to do in literally hundreds of cases. In this one case, because I liked the men and wished to give them a chance to have their cases heard, I made the effort, and frankly, I feel that I am entitled to thanks for having made the effort, and that it is preposterous to feel resentful because I was not able to persuade the editors to do something which in their judgment would have been disadvantageous to the magazine whose interests they were safe guarding. With hearty good wishes, Sincerely yours, (signed) Theodore Roosevelt." <I>Accompanied by COA from PSA/DNA.</B></I>